> There's also no way for us to label, assign or otherwise use PR related > features, so I'm really wondering why it would make sense to more > heavily using them.
Apache does now offer the GitBox service. This makes the github repository writable. The asf and github repos are kept in sync, rather than one being a mirror of the other. I'm not entirely sure this would be the right move for C*, given that patches and branches are merged in a manner that GitHub pull requests don't do (unless you're only committing to trunk). But it would mean PRs can be closed otherwise by any of the committers, and to use the reviewers, assignees, labels, projects and milestone fields. Mick. ref: - http://apache-nifi.1125220.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Apache-Gitbox-td18273.html - https://s3.amazonaws.com/files-dist/AnnualReports/FY2017-ASF-AnnualReport-FINAL.pdf --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org
