+1, if it turns out that something is still valid/important, then people can always re-open.
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Jeff Jirsa <jji...@gmail.com> wrote: > There's a number of JIRAs that are old - sometimes very old - that > represent bugs that either don't exist in modern versions, or don't have > sufficient information for us to repro, but the reporter has gone away. > > Would anyone be offended if I start tagging these with the label > 'UnableToRepro' or 'Unresponsive' and start a 30 day timer to close them? > Anyone have a better suggestion? > -- [image: DataStaxLogo copy3.png] <http://www.datastax.com/> Eduard Tudenhoefner Software Engineer | +49 151 206 111 97 | eduard.tudenhoef...@datastax.com <https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=192476828> <https://www.facebook.com/datastax> <https://twitter.com/etudenhoefner> <https://plus.google.com/+Datastax/about> <http://feeds.feedburner.com/datastax> <https://github.com/nastra/>
