+1 On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 8:26 PM, jason zhao yang < zhaoyangsingap...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 > On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 at 9:36 AM, Jonathan Haddad <j...@jonhaddad.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 6:33 PM Jason Brown <jasedbr...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 18:21 Anthony Grasso <anthony.gra...@gmail.com > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > On 21 March 2017 at 09:32, Jeff Jirsa <jji...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > There's no reason for the dev list to get spammed everytime > there's a > > > > > github PR. We know most of the time we prefer JIRAs for real code > > PRs, > > > > but > > > > > with docs being in tree and low barrier to entry, we may want to > > accept > > > > > docs through PRs ( see https://issues.apache.org/ > > > > > jira/browse/CASSANDRA-13256 > > > > > , and comment on it if you disagree). > > > > > > > > > > To make that viable, we should make it not spam dev@ with every > > > comment. > > > > > Therefore I propose we move github PR comments/actions to pr@ so > as > > > > > not to clutter the dev@ list. > > > > > > > > > > Voting to remain open for 72 hours. > > > > > > > > > > - Jeff > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
