Agreed. Changing vote to -1. Will re-open with Blake's idea.

On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Brandon Williams <dri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I retract my +1 and think instead we should open a vote on Blake's idea.
>
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 5:20 PM, Brandon Williams <dri...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I think this is a better solution.
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Blake Eggleston <beggles...@apple.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Maybe we should add p...@cassandra.apache.org or something and send them
> >> there? I don't subscribe to commits@ because it's too much email, I
> >> would be interested in being notified when a PR is opened though.
> >>
> >> On March 20, 2017 at 3:00:47 PM, Jeff Jirsa (jji...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >>
> >> There's no reason for the dev list to get spammed everytime there's a
> >> github PR. We know most of the time we prefer JIRAs for real code PRs,
> but
> >> with docs being in tree and low barrier to entry, we may want to accept
> >> docs through PRs ( see https://issues.apache.org/jira
> >> /browse/CASSANDRA-13256
> >> , and comment on it if you disagree).
> >>
> >> To make that viable, we should make it not spam dev@ with every
> comment.
> >> Therefore I propose we move github PR comments/actions to commits@ so
> as
> >> not to clutter the dev@ list.
> >>
> >> Voting to remain open for 72 hours.
> >>
> >> - Jeff
> >>
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to