Let me further broaden this discussion to include github branches, which
are often linked on tickets, and then later deleted.  This forces a person
to search through git to actually see the patch, and that process can be a
little rough (especially since we all know if you're gonna make a typo,
it's going to be in the commit, and it's probably going to be the ticket
number.)

On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Jonathan Haddad <j...@jonhaddad.com> wrote:

> If you don't mind, I'd like to broaden the discussion a little bit to also
> discuss performance related patches.  For instance, CASSANDRA-13271 was a
> performance / optimization related patch that included *zero* information
> on if there was any perf improvement or a regression as a result of the
> change, even though I've asked twice for that information.
>
> In addition to "does this thing break anything" we should be asking "how
> does this patch affect performance?" (and were the appropriate docs
> included, but that's another topic altogether)
>
> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 10:51 AM Jason Brown <jasedbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hey all,
> >
> > A nice convention we've stumbled into wrt to patches submitted via Jira
> is
> > to post the results of unit test and dtest runs to the ticket (to show
> the
> > patch doesn't break things). Many contributors have used the
> > DataStax-provided cassci system, but that's not the best long term
> > solution. To that end, I'd like to start a conversation about what is the
> > best way to proceed going forward, and then add it to the "How to
> > contribute" docs.
> >
> > As an example, should contributors/committers run dtests and unit tests
> on
> > *some* machine (publicly available or otherwise), and then post those
> > results to the ticket? This could be a link to a build system, like what
> we
> > have with cassci, or just  upload the output of the test run(s).
> >
> > I don't have any fixed notions, and am looking forward to hearing other's
> > ideas.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > -Jason
> >
> > p.s. a big thank you to DataStax for providing the cassci system
> >
>

Reply via email to