LOL They took down that image finally!! But I would still keep an eye on what kind of fake benchmarks they might come up with.
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 7:11 AM, Amit Trivedi <tria...@gmail.com> wrote: > It indeed is a marketing gimmick. By clubbing Cassandra with likes of > HBase that favors consistency over availability, points under cons section > are all true, just not true when applied to any one database from that > group. > > Thanks and Regards > > Amit Trivedi > > On Feb 7, 2017, 7:32 AM -0500, j.kes...@enercast.de, wrote: > > Deeper inside there is a diagram: > > > > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cockroachdb/cockroach/ > master/docs/media/sql-nosql-newsql.png > > > > They compare to NoSQL along with Riak, HBase and Cassandra. > > > > Of course you CAN have a Cassandra cluster which is not fully available > with loss of a dc nor consistent. > > > > Marketing 😊 > > > > Gesendet von meinem Windows 10 Phone > > > > *Von:* DuyHai Doan <doanduy...@gmail.com> > *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 7. Februar 2017 11:53 > *An:* dev@cassandra.apache.org > *Cc:* u...@cassandra.apache.org > *Betreff:* Re: Why does CockroachDB github website say Cassandra has > noAvailability on datacenter failure? > > > > The link you posted doesn't say anything about Cassandra > > Le 7 févr. 2017 11:41, "Kant Kodali" <k...@peernova.com> a écrit : > > Why does CockroachDB github website say Cassandra has no Availability on > datacenter failure? > > https://github.com/cockroachdb/cockroach > > > >
