Dunno. A sneaky correctness or data corruption bug. A performance regression. Or something that can take a node/cluster down.
Of course no process is bullet-proof. The purpose of review is to minimise the odds of such a thing happening. I’m sure users running Cassandra in production would prefer actual proper reviews to non-review +1s. -- AY On 4 November 2016 at 23:03:23, Edward Capriolo (edlinuxg...@gmail.com) wrote: I feel that is really standing up on a soap box. What would be the worst thing that happens here
