+1. Check out ASFBot for logging IRC, along with other integrations.[1]

ASFBot can also be used for record keeping for IRC meetings (example [3]) which 
can automatically be sent to the appropriate apache mailing list. All other 
logs are archived online. [4] It’d easy enough to link to those archived logs 
via the website, etc.

[1] http://wilderness.apache.org/manual.html 
<http://wilderness.apache.org/manual.html>
[3] http://wilderness.apache.org/#meetings 
<http://wilderness.apache.org/#meetings>
[4] http://wilderness.apache.org/channels/#logs-#aurora 
<http://wilderness.apache.org/channels/#logs-%23aurora>

> On Aug 26, 2016, at 11:17 AM, Jason Brown <jasedbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> +1. How/where will this run? Is there any apache infra that we can make use
> of?
> 
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Jake Luciani <jak...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> +1 so long as it filters out the join/leave stuff :)
>> 
>> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Jeff Jirsa <jeff.ji...@crowdstrike.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> There exists a #cassandra-dev IRC channel that’s historically been used
>> by
>>> developers discussing the project – while it’s public, it’s not archived,
>>> and it’s not a mailing list. The ASF encourages all discussion to be
>>> archived, and ideally, archived on a public mailing list.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Jake suggested, and I want to propose on the list, that we copy a log of
>>> that channel (minus join/part activity) to dev@ either daily or weekly.
>>> We’ll need to make sure we comply with Freenode’s IRC logging policy, but
>>> the project / developers receives the best of both worlds – fast, real
>> time
>>> chat but also public archives/visibility for people who aren’t online at
>> a
>>> given moment. The volume may be a bit higher than most of us have come
>>> expect from the list, but it brings the project closer to doing things in
>>> The Apache Way, and we can give it an easily-filtered subject for folks
>> who
>>> don’t want that noise.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> http://twitter.com/tjake
>> 

Reply via email to