>> Any reason not to draw a line in the sand for the next stabilization
release (3.9)?

+1

Josh, add me to the "test fixers" queue, as well. However, I think the
authors of patches that break the build should also be on the hook for
fixing problems, as well.




On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Jonathan Ellis <jbel...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Also +1 from me.  Any reason not to draw a line in the sand for the next
> stabilization release (3.9)?
>
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 3:11 PM, sankalp kohli <kohlisank...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >     I am +1 for not releasing new version till we fix the unit tests.
> Yes I
> > am interested in being added to the queue to make testing better. I have
> > fixed a bunch of flaky tests in our internal build and will open source
> > them soon.
> >
> > Can the PMC give some guidance on making releases block on unit tests?
> >
> > Also I see many unit tests commented out by 8099 like
> StreamTransferTest. I
> > dont know the history there so want to know if this is intentional?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Sankalp
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 8:35 AM, Josh McKenzie <jmcken...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I've recently started a hard push for getting test tickets prioritized
> > and
> > > assigned to various contributors, and I'm pushing for us to have a
> > > consistent green test board for 3.9. While I'm not on the PMC so can't
> > > binding -1 a release vote, I'd non-binding -1 3.9 if we don't have
> stable
> > > tests.
> > >
> > > After that release my focus is going to shift to trunk (3.10) for
> > > stabilization; it's definitely something that's become a higher
> priority
> > > within the past month or so.
> > >
> > > If you or anyone else on the dev list here would like to be included in
> > the
> > > test-fixing assignment queue to help speed up the process (and get to
> > know
> > > parts of the code-base you don't yet know!), please let me know and
> I'll
> > > start kicking out test fix tickets your way once triaged.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 7:08 PM, sankalp kohli <kohlisank...@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi All,
> > > >           I can see that unit tests are very flaky in trunk as well
> as
> > > > previous versions of Cassandra. Out of the last 100 builds(#949 to
> > #1049)
> > > > for trunk, I only saw 1 successful build.
> > > >
> > > > Is there any plan to fix the failing tests that I am not aware of? I
> > see
> > > > lots of tickets recently for failing dtests, and am hoping the unit
> > tests
> > > > can receive similar attention.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Sankalp
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Jonathan Ellis
> Project Chair, Apache Cassandra
> co-founder, http://www.datastax.com
> @spyced
>

Reply via email to