The only thing I worry about here is that the unit tests don't come into the system the same way user queries will. So we still need the system level dtests. So I don't think all CQL tests should be unit tests, but I am all for there being unit level CQL tests.
On May 22, 2014, at 10:58 AM, Sylvain Lebresne <sylv...@datastax.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 10:46 PM, Jonathan Ellis <jbel...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I do think that CQL tests in general make more sense as unit tests, >> but I'm not so anal that I'm going to insist on rewriting existing >> ones. But in theory, if I had an infinite army of interns, sure. I'd >> have one of them do that. :) >> >> But in the real world, compared to saying "we don't have any cql unit >> tests, so we should always write them as dtests to be consistent" I >> think having mixed unit + dtests is the lesser of evils. >> > > Fair enough. I'll try to make CQL tests as unit tests from now on as much > as possible (I can't promise a few misfire in the short term). Let's hope > you > find your infinite intern army someday. > > -- > Sylvain
