Alright, seems we can use a beta 3 before calling this a RC1. So I'm closing this vote and I'll rebrand this as beta3 and do a short 24h with that. And hopefully we'll have a true RC1 quickly after that.
Stay tuned. -- Sylvain On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Brandon Williams <dri...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Jonathan Ellis <jbel...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm not a fan of blocking a new rc because of bugs that are not > > regressions new in that release. I'd also like to get more testing on > > the 1.2 fixes since b2. But we can call it b3 instead of rc1 if you > > want. > > I agree with everything you've said. I'm fine with calling it b3, > though I expect we'll have that ticket closed soon and could re-roll > an rc1 on Tuesday. > > -Brandon >