Alright, seems we can use a beta 3 before calling this a RC1.
So I'm closing this vote and I'll rebrand this as beta3 and do a short 24h
with that. And hopefully we'll have a true RC1 quickly after that.

Stay tuned.

--
Sylvain


On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Brandon Williams <dri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Jonathan Ellis <jbel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm not a fan of blocking a new rc because of bugs that are not
> > regressions new in that release.  I'd also like to get more testing on
> > the 1.2 fixes since b2.  But we can call it b3 instead of rc1 if you
> > want.
>
> I agree with everything you've said.  I'm fine with calling it b3,
> though I expect we'll have that ticket closed soon and could re-roll
> an rc1 on Tuesday.
>
> -Brandon
>

Reply via email to