On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 4:50 AM, Sylvain Lebresne <sylv...@datastax.com>wrote:
> Also, if committer != > reviewer, there is the slight issue of how the committer make sure > that he commits what has been reviewer (i.e, that author hasn't made > some last minute, post-review change). But I suppose we can either say > "don't do that" and trust people, or ask reviewer to comment with > something like "+1 on 666:<sha1 of last commit>". > Signed git tags are a real good fit for this sort of thing. Or even unsigned annotated tags, if we have a pretty high default trust level. p
