On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Gary Dusbabek <gdusba...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 17:22, Eric Evans <eev...@acunu.com> wrote: >> There are some workarounds that have been proposed for moving the >> drivers back under Cassandra's source tree while creating independent >> releases from there. For example, keeping them only in trunk/ and >> deleting drivers/ in new branches (which doesn't solve the case for >> #3010). In my opinion, these are half-measures that fail to create >> the needed separation while making the release process brittle, or >> complicated, or both, and generate confusion (which incidentally is >> exactly why they were moved in the first place). > > Some apache projects organize their code into multiple trunks, and > that sounds like it would help us out here.
If you mean what Stephen describes here, http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.db.cassandra.devel/3974, then I'd be down for it. Seems like it would be pretty disruptive though. -- Eric Evans Acunu | http://www.acunu.com | @acunu
