On Sun, 2011-07-24 at 11:33 +0300, David Boxenhorn wrote: > Could we have a strict mode that would enforce quoting terms (this would be > used in code) and a lax version that could be used in interactive mode, > where backward compatibility is not so important?
It's possible, but the skeptic (cynic?) in me thinks that's just one more variable in the equation, and one people will frequently trip over. > > > On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Eric Evans <eev...@rackspace.com> > > > > I have a feeling that #2 is easier said than done. So long as we're > > > > allowing the unquoted form, people will use it and be surprised when > > > > bit. Aside from that it seems OK. -- Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com
