After discussion on #cassandra-dev, I amend my vote to -0.
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:29, Gary Dusbabek <gdusba...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:12, Sylvain Lebresne <sylv...@datastax.com> wrote: >> Yes, there has been a change of the messaging server version >> between 0.8.0 and 0.8.1. >> > > Do we hate our users or something? This is a bad idea. > > The whole idea behind CASSANDRA-1015 was that we would reserve changes > like this to major versions. Putting these kinds of changes into a > dot release (remember--the user isn't expecting trouble) is > destabilizing and is the same kind of process that made 0.7.x > unreliable. > > -1 on including CASSANDRA-2280 in 0.8.1. > > Gary. > > >> -- >> Sylvain >> >> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Peter Schuller >> <peter.schul...@infidyne.com> wrote: >>>> If things are working properly, he shouldn't see any of these messages >>>> on a minor version upgrade because the version number should remain >>>> constant. The message version should only change on major releases >>>> (if necessary). >>>> >>>> It could be that the existing cluster was built with non-released code >>>> (sporting a different message version). >>> >>> I believe it is expected in this case due to >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2280 >>> >>> -- >>> / Peter Schuller >>> >> >
