That's reasonable. Terje and Shotaro found a real regression though (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2626) so we'll re-roll with that fix anyway.
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Ian Holsman <had...@holsman.net> wrote: > my suggestion would be to release 0.8.0, and work on 0.8.1 to be released in > the next couple of weeks with this bug-fix and others that you might find. > > you can put a note in the README/release notes on how to get pig running with > 0.8.0. > > regards > Ian > On May 25, 2011, at 12:19 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > >> I guess you could call it either way, but enough people depend on Pig >> these days that we wanted to move it into core for 0.8. It's still in >> contrib/ because nobody actually had the time to do the requisite ant >> wrangling, but it's effectively as important as the o.a.c.hadoop >> package (which is where we want to move it). >> >> No, I would not re-roll a release to fix example code. >> >> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Eric Evans <eev...@rackspace.com> wrote: >>> On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 22:22 -0500, Jonathan Ellis wrote: >>>> Pig is broken in this build; Brandon fixed it in r1127188. >>> >>> Are we blocking releases for contrib and example code now? >>> >>> -- >>> Eric Evans >>> eev...@rackspace.com >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Jonathan Ellis >> Project Chair, Apache Cassandra >> co-founder of DataStax, the source for professional Cassandra support >> http://www.datastax.com > > -- Jonathan Ellis Project Chair, Apache Cassandra co-founder of DataStax, the source for professional Cassandra support http://www.datastax.com
