On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 17:02 +0100, Bjorn Borud wrote: > Eric Evans <eev...@rackspace.com> writes: > > > I have little faith at this point that maintaining a pom.xml is > going to > > work for us. > > why? (if you have answered this question before I apologize)
This has come up a lot, the list archives tell the story, but the executive summary is: 1. Someone contributes a pom.xml and promises to maintain it. 2. They don't. 3. It becomes horribly out of date and is removed. 4. Goto 1 -- Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com
