For the record, the regression was caused by 1622, noticed in testing for 1719, and fixed in 1727. :)
+1 on the release from me, and I'm okay with expediting it. On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Eric Evans <eev...@rackspace.com> wrote: > > We had a regression in the way of CASSANDRA-1719[1] make its way into > the last release. With that fixed now, I'd like to propose the following > artifacts for 0.6.8. > > SVN: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-...@r1034097 > 0.6.8 artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~eevans > > I'd be happy to make an exception here and shorten the voting period to > expedite this release (say 24 hours?), but only if there is consensus. > I don't want anyone to feel they weren't given enough time to lodge a > veto. > > [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1719 > [2]: http://goo.gl/ssWSW (CHANGES.txt) > > > -- > Eric Evans > eev...@rackspace.com > > -- Jonathan Ellis Project Chair, Apache Cassandra co-founder of Riptano, the source for professional Cassandra support http://riptano.com
