On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Jonathan Ellis <jbel...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Ryan King <r...@twitter.com> wrote: >> Sorry, been catching up on this. >> >> From Twitter's perspective, 1546 is probably insufficient because it >> doesn't allow one to do time-series data without supercolumns (which >> might work ok, but require a good deal of work). Additionally, one of >> our deployed systems already does supercolumns of counters, which is >> not feasible in this design at all. > > True, although wouldn't rows-of-counters give you basically the same > thing if 1546 kept its counters as subcolumns of a supercolumn?
That would solve the first part (single-dimension time-series), but we also do supercolumns of counters, which 1546 doesn't appear to be able to address. -ryan
