So far, I think I'm going for Pylons, the discussion gave this "pseudo-votes":
Pylons +3 Tornado +1 Django +1 Undetermined +2 Any further comments on this issue will be appreciated! Thanks! On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 4:58 AM, Eric Florenzano <flo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Bottom line with this kind of a project is to go with what you're most > familiar with. If you're equally unfamiliar with all frameworks, then the > quality of documentation becomes more important. > > Personally, I'd take a hard look at Werkzeug--it's a library, not a > framework. Which means you get to pick and choose what bits you want in a > sort of a-la-carte way. In the end, similarly to Pylons or Django, you get > a WSGI app that can be served out of the many different WSGI-aware web > servers like Apache's mod_wsgi, gunicorn, cherrypy, or even the builtin > wsgiref from the standard library. > > Anyway, I'm not sure if that helps or makes things more confusing :) > > Thanks, > Eric Florenzano > > On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Pablo Cuadrado > <pablocuadr...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> It is indeed a web framework, and made for sys admins to interact with >> Cassandra, not for hosting millions of users concurrently. >> >> And you're right: those are helloworld benchmarks. >> >> I was concerned a few days ago about the sync/async issue, browsing >> over examples on Telephus, Twissandra, Lazyboy, Pycassa... then I >> thought that Lazyboy is largely being used in production AFAIK, so >> I've just kept it in my mind. >> >> However, the communication layer for the web UI, should (and hopefully >> it will) be independent, in case we want to make this changes in the >> future. >> >> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Joseph Bowman <bowman.jos...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > I don't really consider any hello world benchmarks valid, you'd want to >> > investigate what your implementation would entail in different frameworks >> > and do mini-benchmarks to validate which is faster. But, if it's just a >> web >> > framework, as Brandon said, I doubt performance will matter to any great >> > degree. You'd be more concerned about Cassandra's performance, which is >> > pretty darn good. >> > >> > On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Brandon Williams <dri...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> >> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Pablo Cuadrado < >> pablocuadr...@gmail.com >> >> >wrote: >> >> >> >> > Yes, I'm planning on Lazyboy. >> >> > >> >> > The Performance part on the Tornado wiki is quite impressive. Do you >> >> > think it's accurate? >> >> > >> >> > http://www.tornadoweb.org/documentation#performance >> >> >> >> >> >> Using Lazyboy, you'd be mixing blocking sockets with a nonblocking event >> >> loop, so performance is likely less than optimal. That said, I doubt >> >> performance is a concern with a web UI. >> >> >> >> -Brandon >> >> >> > >> >
