Darpan Lunagariya (e6data) created CALCITE-7757:
---------------------------------------------------

             Summary: RelMdFunctionalDependency can infer unsound dependencies 
and cause incorrect query results
                 Key: CALCITE-7757
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-7757
             Project: Calcite
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: core
    Affects Versions: 1.42.0
            Reporter: Darpan Lunagariya (e6data)
            Assignee: Darpan Lunagariya (e6data)


h2. Summary

{{RelMdFunctionalDependency}} currently infers functional dependencies that do 
not always hold under SQL null, grouping, ordinal, and value-equality semantics.

{{AggregateRemoveDuplicateKeysRule}} consumes this metadata and can 
consequently remove a necessary grouping key, changing query results.

h2. Correctness problems

h3. Outer-join equality dependencies

{{LEFT}} and {{RIGHT}} joins are handled like {{INNER}} joins. Equality 
predicates currently create bidirectional dependencies even though 
null-generated columns do not generally determine preserved-side columns.

For example:

{code:sql}
SELECT d.deptno, e.deptno, COUNT(*)
FROM emp e
LEFT JOIN dept d ON e.deptno = d.deptno
GROUP BY d.deptno, e.deptno
{code}

For unmatched rows, {{d.deptno}} is always {{NULL}}, but {{e.deptno}} can have 
different values. Therefore:

{code}
d.deptno -> e.deptno
{code}

does not hold.

Even the opposite direction is not generally safe when the join has additional 
predicates, because rows with the same preserved-side equality key may be 
matched or unmatched.

h3. Dependencies from the null-generated input

This problem does not depend on deriving a functional dependency from the join 
condition.

{{RelMdFunctionalDependency}} first obtains the dependencies of both join 
inputs. For a {{LEFT JOIN}}, it currently copies all dependencies from the 
right input into the join result. However, null padding can invalidate a 
dependency that was valid within the right input.

Consider:

{code:sql}
SELECT r.a, r.y, COUNT(*) AS c
FROM (VALUES (1), (2)) AS l(z)
LEFT JOIN (
  SELECT z, a, COALESCE(a, 1) AS y
  FROM (VALUES (1, CAST(NULL AS INTEGER))) AS v(z, a)
) AS r
ON l.z = r.z
GROUP BY r.a, r.y
{code}

Before the join, the right-side Project establishes {{r.a -> r.y}} because 
{{r.y}} is the deterministic expression {{COALESCE(r.a, 1)}}.

The {{LEFT JOIN}} produces:

{code}
l.z=1: matched row   -> r.a=NULL, r.y=1
l.z=2: unmatched row -> r.a=NULL, r.y=NULL
{code}

After null padding, both rows have the same value of {{r.a}} but different 
values of {{r.y}}. Therefore {{r.a -> r.y}} no longer holds in the join result.

h3. Incorrect Aggregate ordinal mapping

{{RelMdFunctionalDependency}} carries {{Aggregate}} input ordinals into the 
{{Aggregate}} output without mapping the input {{groupSet}} indices to packed 
output positions.

For example, after {{AggregateProjectMergeRule}}:

{code}
Aggregate input groupSet:       {1, 2, 3}
Aggregate output key positions: {0, 1, 2}
{code}

An input dependency such as {{1 -> 2}} can therefore be incorrectly interpreted 
as an output dependency between positions {{1}} and {{2}}. This can cause an 
unrelated grouping column to be removed.

For example, given:

{code:sql}
SELECT a, b, c, COUNT(*)
FROM (
  VALUES
    (0, 1, 1, 10),
    (0, 1, 1, 20)
) AS t(z, a, b, c)
WHERE a = b
GROUP BY a, b, c
{code}

The correct result contains two groups:

{code}
a=1, b=1, c=10, count=1
a=1, b=1, c=20, count=1
{code}

The incorrect rewrite removes {{c}} and produces one group with {{count=2}}.

h3. Equality-derived dependencies for approximate numeric types

Filter and Join equality conditions infer bidirectional functional dependencies 
without checking operand types.

For {{DOUBLE}}, SQL considers {{0.0 = -0.0}} true, while grouping can 
distinguish the two values.

For example:

{code:sql}
SELECT x, y, COUNT(*)
FROM (
  VALUES
    (CAST(0 AS DOUBLE), CAST(0 AS DOUBLE)),
    (CAST(0 AS DOUBLE), -CAST(0 AS DOUBLE))
) AS t(x, y)
WHERE x = y
GROUP BY x, y
{code}

The original query produces two groups with {{COUNT(*) = 1}}. If {{y}} is 
removed based on the inferred dependency {{x -> y}}, the rewritten query 
produces one group with {{COUNT(*) = 2}}.

Equality-derived dependencies therefore require conservative type and 
equality-semantics checks.

h3. Derived-expression dependencies require stronger safety checks

Project metadata currently assumes that a deterministic expression is 
functionally determined by its referenced columns.

For safe types, this allows valid rewrites such as {{GROUP BY col, col + 2}} to 
{{GROUP BY col}}

However, determinism alone does not guarantee that values considered equal for 
grouping produce grouping-equivalent derived values.

At minimum, the implementation must conservatively handle:

* {{FLOAT}}
* {{DOUBLE}}
* {{INTERVAL}}
* Nested occurrences of those types
* Collated values
* Custom types with non-trivial equality semantics
* Open-ended container types whose runtime values may contain unsafe types

The required condition is stronger than determinism:

{code}
base values are grouping-equivalent
  implies
derived values are grouping-equivalent
{code}

h2. Expected behavior

{{RelMdFunctionalDependency}} should only report dependencies that remain valid 
under the relational expression's:

* Null-generation semantics
* Input-to-output ordinal mapping
* SQL equality semantics
* Grouping equality semantics
* Expression stability and type semantics

{{AggregateRemoveDuplicateKeysRule}} must leave the plan unchanged when a 
dependency cannot be proven safely.

h2. Acceptance criteria

* Add functional-dependency metadata tests covering all five cases.
* Add {{AggregateRemoveDuplicateKeysRule}} wrong-result regression tests.
* Handle {{LEFT}} and {{RIGHT}} joins symmetrically and conservatively.
* Do not automatically preserve all dependencies from a null-generated input.
* Correctly map {{Aggregate}} input group ordinals to output positions.
* Add equality-compatibility checks for Filter and Join equality-derived 
dependencies.
* Add recursive type-safety checks for derived-expression dependencies.
* Preserve valid existing optimizations, including:

{code}
GROUP BY col, col + 2
  ->
GROUP BY col
{code}

for types where the transformation is safe.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to