If you take a look at

https://www.openlogic.com/openjdk-downloads?field_java_parent_version_target_id=416&field_operating_system_target_id=426&field_architecture_target_id=391&field_java_package_target_id=All

The most recent release is 8u412-b08

If it follows more or less the openjdk schedule:

https://wiki.openjdk.org/display/jdk8u/Main

*Most recent and past release details:*

   - 8u412-b08 (GA), April 16th 2024 [Release <https://bit.ly/openjdk8u412>]
   [Tag <https://github.com/openjdk/jdk8u/releases/tag/jdk8u412-ga>] [
   Binaries
   <https://github.com/adoptium/temurin8-binaries/releases/tag/jdk8u412-b08>
   ]
   - 8u402-b06 (GA), January 16th 2024 [Release
   <https://bit.ly/openjdk8u402>] [Tag
   <https://github.com/openjdk/jdk8u/releases/tag/jdk8u402-ga>] [Binaries
   <https://github.com/adoptium/temurin8-binaries/releases/tag/jdk8u402-b06>
   ]
   - 8u392-b08 (GA), October 17th 2023 [Release
   <https://bit.ly/openjdk8u392>] [Tag
   <https://github.com/openjdk/jdk8u/releases/tag/jdk8u392-ga>] [Binaries
   <https://github.com/adoptium/temurin8-binaries/releases/tag/jdk8u392-b08>
   ]
   - 8u382-b05 (GA), July 18th 2023 [Release <https://bit.ly/openjdk8u382>]
   [Tag <https://github.com/openjdk/jdk8u/releases/tag/jdk8u382-ga>] [
   Binaries
   <https://github.com/adoptium/temurin8-binaries/releases/tag/jdk8u382-b05>
   ]
   - 8u372-b07 (GA), April 18th 2023 [Release <https://bit.ly/openjdk8u372>]
   [Tag <https://github.com/openjdk/jdk8u/releases/tag/jdk8u372-ga>] [
   Binaries
   <https://github.com/adoptium/temurin8-binaries/releases/tag/jdk8u372-b07>
   ]


This means your java version is from April 2023. Can you try to update your
system to the latest build 8u412-b08 and publish the jarfile somewhere I
can test ?


On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 2:25 PM Sergey Nuyanzin <snuyan...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks for testing Guillaume
>
> >Sergey can you give me all the details about your build environment so I
> >can reproduce that bytecode?
> >OS / java --version
> yep, sure
> Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS,
> 1.8.0_372-372 (OpenLogic-OpenJDK 25.372-b07)
>
> I will also try to look at it with my set up and the info  you've provided
>
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 8:03 PM Guillaume Masse
> <masse.guilla...@narrative.io.invalid> wrote:
>
> > -1 (not binding)
> >
> > The bytecode of classfile org/apache/calcite/runtime/SqlFunctions.class
> is
> > invalid (and only this classfile)
> >
> > I tested all class files from the following artifacts:
> > calcite-core-1.37.0.jar
> > calcite-linq4j-1.37.0.jar
> > avatica-core-1.25.0.jar
> > avatica-metrics-1.25.0.jar
> >
> > This will prevent bytecode tools like asm (https://asm.ow2.io/) from
> > transforming calcite bytecode (for example shading a dependency).
> >
> > See
> > https://gitlab.ow2.org/asm/asm/-/issues/318008
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/nrt4ysoc14p20sq23z744jyfqh1bznyh
> >
> > To reproduce
> > https://github.com/MasseGuillaume/asm-remapper-bug
> >
> > Sergey can you give me all the details about your build environment so I
> > can reproduce that bytecode?
> > OS / java --version
> >
> > I do not have the root cause of the issue.
> > I suspect it's related to import
> > org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual.Nullable
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 10:56 AM Sergey Nuyanzin <snuyan...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > The issue CALCITE-6390 with failing of Arrow Adapter tests on Windows
> > while
> > > building from source is fixed.
> > > Thanks  a lot to Caican Can for highlighting the issue
> > > Stamatis for quick PR
> > > and Ruben and Alessandro for the review!
> > >
> > > I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.37.0, release
> > > candidate 4.
> > >
> > > Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release.
> > >
> > > You can read the release notes here:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/calcite-1.37.0-rc4/site/_docs/history.md
> > >
> > > The commit to be voted upon:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=calcite.git;a=commit;h=044db3d72ee53c1a82ce68b0c2a9b4f0bed81f18
> > >
> > > Its hash is 044db3d72ee53c1a82ce68b0c2a9b4f0bed81f18
> > >
> > > Tag:
> > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/tree/calcite-1.37.0-rc4
> > >
> > > The artifacts to be voted on are located here:
> > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.37.0-rc4
> > > (revision 68857)
> > >
> > > The hashes of the artifacts are as follows:
> > >
> > >
> >
> a6ae7ea1ebbab3e5b723122c9517412d74b6bccba9fb41d360f7c2262ed7f26e5a4cc861a711d4813d27d72a0ffd086ae3a9175abc3c874b079137c84d13f83a
> > > *apache-calcite-1.37.0-src.tar.gz
> > >
> > > A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecalcite-1230/org/apache/calcite/
> > >
> > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/snuyanzin.asc
> > > https://www.apache.org/dist/calcite/KEYS
> > >
> > > To create the jars and test Apache Calcite: "gradle build"
> > > (requires an appropriate Gradle/JDK installation)
> > >
> > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Calcite 1.37.0.
> > >
> > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> > > least three +1 PMC votes are cast.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Calcite 1.37.0
> > > [ ]  0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> > >
> > > Here is my vote:
> > >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > > Sergey
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Sergey
>

Reply via email to