If we get the 1.34.0 out a bit sooner than usual I guess this will be good
enough for Drill. If the others agree I can try to prepare an RC during
next week. WDYT ?

Best,
Stamatis


On Sat, Mar 4, 2023, 6:13 PM Alessandro Solimando <
[email protected]> wrote:

> The second option Benchao mentions is what Hive currently does as well.
>
> Best regards,
> Alessandro
>
> On Sat 4 Mar 2023, 13:19 Benchao Li, <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Charles,
> >
> > Thank for reaching out!
> >
> > IIRC, the idea of releasing bugfix version has been brought up in the
> past,
> > but I couldn't find the discussion (in Jira and dev ML).
> >
> > I'd like to share my understanding why we chose not to release bug fix
> > versions, please correct me if I'm wrong,
> > - Calcite has many bug fixes that span multi versions (even more that 10
> > versions), then only keeping several (such as 3) bug fix releases does
> not
> > solve all these problems.
> > - Actually we usually do not distinguish too much between "bugfix" and
> "new
> > feature", so maintaining bug fix releases is not that easy.
> > - Calcite lacks reviewers and also release managers, only keeping linear
> > releasing in rhythm could save us some efforts.
> >
> > For regressions, I agree that this hurts downstream projects. For such
> > cases, there are two approaches come into my mind:
> > - We can release a new version quickly than usual.
> > - The projects that need the fix/feature before our next scheduled
> release,
> > they could copy these files into their projects, as we already did in
> > Flink[1]. They could remove these files once they adopt the new release
> of
> > Calcite.
> >
> > I hope this helps.
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/flink/tree/master/flink-table/flink-table-planner/src/main/java/org/apache/calcite
> >
> >
> > Charles Givre <[email protected]> 于2023年3月2日周四 06:22写道:
> >
> > > Hello Calcite Devs,
> > > I wanted to thank everyone for the recent release of Calcite 1.33.  I
> am
> > > the PMC Chair for Apache Drill and we just released Drill 1.21[0] which
> > is
> > > now using the latest version of Calcite instead of our 2-3 year old
> fork!
> > >
> > > However, we encountered a small issue with Calcite 1.33 that does not
> > > affect just Drill.  Specifically, there was a regression which was
> caused
> > > by CALCITE-5447[1] which effectively broke the DATE_TRUNC function.
>  The
> > > bugfix has been fixed and merged in CALCITE-5522[2].
> > >
> > > In any event, given that this function is fairly important and the
> > lengthy
> > > release schedules of both Drill and Calcite, I wanted to ask whether
> the
> > > Calcite might consider doing a quick bugfix release with this and any
> > other
> > > regressions that may have popped up in 1.33 and have since been fixed.
> > >
> > > Thank you very much for all your work!
> > > Best,
> > > -- Charles
> > >
> > >
> > > [0]:
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/drill-site/blob/master/blog/_posts/en/2023-02-21-drill-1.21.0-released.md
> > > [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5447
> > > [2]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5522
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Best,
> > Benchao Li
> >
>

Reply via email to