I think that your first query, SELECT f0.a, max(f1) FROM t1 GROUP BY f0
should be valid. I don't know whether the SQL standard thinks it should be valid, or whether Calcite can handle it. And I don't know why PostgreSQL has a problem with it. Julian On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 9:41 PM Danny Chan <[email protected]> wrote: > > CREATE TYPE my_type AS ( a int , b VARCHAR(20)); > > create table t1( > f0 my_type, > f1 int, > f2 varchar(20) > ); > > insert into t1 values((1, 'abc'), 2, βdefβ); > > SELECT f0.a, max(f1) FROM t1 GROUP BY f0; β this is invalid in PostgreSQL > > SELECT f0, max(f1) FROM t1 GROUP BY f0; β this is a valid query > > > My question is does SQL standard allows projecting nested fields for > aggregate ? In current Calcite, it throws and complains that the nested field > can not be seen in the scope (somehow same with the PG). > > Best, > Danny Chan
