Danny,

Can you fix the tag please?

Julian


> On Mar 6, 2020, at 10:26 AM, Vladimir Sitnikov <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
>> The RexNode normalization and project names remove from digest did change
> a lot of plan from the Apache Flink side
> 
> Hey Danny, I see it is dissatisfying, however, it is really sad you have
> never revealed which plans required changes and why.
> 
>> The java doc doesn’t distinguish main API and test API, they are just
> together [1]
> 
> I do not see "test API" there. Can you please clarify?
> 
>> • The calcite-core does not publish the test sources now, should we add it
> back ?
> 
> We should **drop** publishing test artifacts via classifiers.
> The problem with classifier-style approach is those artifacts can't declare
> their dependencies.
> 
> We have already discussed it, and there was an agreement that we could
> extract calcite-test-framework or something like that.
> It could come as a separate artifact with its own properly-declared
> dependencies, sources, etc, etc.
> 
>> Do we need to put the credit (commit name) after each commit message ? It
> seems many projects put the credits in the last part together of the
> release note
> 
> I think we should stop adding (contributor name) in the commit message.
> Git does have a proper field for the author's name. Of course committers
> need to ensure they don't overwrite that field by accident.
> 
> Now we have Gradle, so we could even automate certain tasks.
> For instance, it could process Git history and build a list of
> contributors, etc, etc.
> 
> 
>> The RC artifacts was removed when I do the release, which actually I think
> should not do, one awkward thing is that my network sucks
> 
> What do you mean by "RC artifacts removed"?
> Release plugin does svn **MOVE** from repos/dist/dev to repos/dist/release/
> This makes it clear that the release artifacts are the same as the ones
> used for vote.
> 
> 
> Vladimir

Reply via email to