Thank you for this notification.

Please try to make CALCITE-3272[1] into 1.22 (change the fix version to
1.22 already).


[1]: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1587

-Rui

On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 6:35 PM Chunwei Lei <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thank you for your work, Anderi.
>
> Let's get CALCITE-1581[1] into 1.22.
>
> +1 for release at early-mid January '20 (to have more time to review prs).
>
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1138
>
>
> Best,
> Chunwei
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 8:02 AM Andrei Sereda <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Calcite 1.21 was released about 3 months ago (2019-09) and it is time to
> > start preparation for 1.22.
> >
> > Current open issues and pull requests can be seen in [1] and [2]. There
> are
> > many PRs left from previous releases and it would be nice to review as
> many
> > as possible. Please change "fix version" in JIRA to 1.22 if you would
> like
> > the contribution be considered for this release. It is also helpful to
> mark
> > PR with "LGTM-will-merge-soon" label so other contributors are aware of
> > your review.
> >
> > Committers please go over existing PRs and try to prioritize / finalize
> > them. Also let me know which changes (in your opinion) are ready or
> should
> > be considered for this release. Don't forget that current policy of
> > frequent releases allows better work scheduling without blocking existing
> > release plan.
> >
> > In terms of dates, let's agree on release time frame late December '19 or
> > early-mid January '20 ?
> >
> > Let me know if I have missed anything or if current plan is inconvenient.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Andrei.
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> > [2] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pulls
> >
>

Reply via email to