+1 On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 9:44 AM Julian Feinauer < [email protected]> wrote:
> We also use it for PLC4X and it works flawlessly. > +1 > > Julian > > Am 11.02.19, 11:23 schrieb "Vova Vysotskyi" <[email protected]>: > > Great idea! Drill website already uses gitbox [1] > > +1 > > [1] https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=drill-site.git > > Kind regards, > Volodymyr Vysotskyi > > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 12:01 PM Francis Chuang < > [email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hey all, > > > > ASF project sites have the ability to use git instead of subversion > as > > their repository for web site content [1]. It has been available > since > > 2015 and appears to be quite stable. Quite a few other projects have > > also moved their websites to git and subsequently, Gitbox (for using > > Github as their source of truth. As an example, see the Arrow > project [2]. > > > > I myself would love to see this as I find gits interface and ux to be > > much easier to use compared to svn. It also reduces the need to > context > > switch between Git and svn when editing and pushing the site. > > > > My overall goal is to find a way to automate the publishing and > build of > > our websites either via Jenkins builds (there are some projects are > > doing this already when I searched infra) or the new Github actions > [3]. > > Having the site hosted in Git would make this process much easier to > > automate. I will need to get in touch with infra to clarify a few > things > > and to see if this is feasible, but I think this is a worthwhile > endeavor. > > > > How do you guys feel about moving our site's repository from svn to > GitBox? > > > > Francis > > > > > > [1] > https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/git_based_websites_available > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17655 > > [3] https://github.com/features/actions > > > > >
