You said upfront you were going to use lazy consensus. The discussion didn’t reach consensus. You went ahead anyway.
> On Sep 25, 2018, at 2:12 AM, Vladimir Sitnikov <[email protected]> > wrote: > > The following is for the reference purposes, and there's not a single > intend to accuse anybody of doing something (e.g. miscalculations or > whatever). > My calculations might be off so please correct me if you think that is > important. > > 1) Calcite includes 16 committers + 19 PMC. Most of them were silent. > > 2) http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/calcite-dev/201809.mbox/thread?2 > shows (as of time when I create this message) that the thread has 14 > messages 5 of which were generated by me > > 3) Apache voting (see > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#votes-on-code-modification ) > explicitly recommends to use whole numbers for voting on code modifications. > > 4) No-one killed a proposal with a veto > > 5) Most of replies were around +-0, except Michael who was +0.5 and Jacques > who was -0.9 (note that he explicitly declares he does not veto the change) > To my best knowledge: > Michael Mior +0.5 (binding) > Laurent Goujon -0 (binding) > Enrico Olivelli -0 > Jacques Nadeau -0.9 (binding) > Vladimir Sitnikov ++1 (binding) > > 6) I'm sure we don't really want to discuss this. I suggest we don't spend > time on splitting hairs here. > Apparently there's not that many people who care enough to spend time on > this discussion. > > Vladimir
