@walaa, AFAIK, both Flink and Spark offer LINQ style API, other than SQL.

@julian, QueryableRelBuilder currently are mostly unimplemented, I think a
good starting point would be to add unittests. But I think LINQ interface
would be a good addition to current SQL interface, and should receive some
love.

Also, here is a good read <https://www.linqpad.net/WhyLINQBeatsSQL.aspx> on
LINQ vs SQL.

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 4:09 PM, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote:

> QueryableRelBuilder can handle translating simple Linq4j expressions
> to RelNodes. E.g. QueryableRelBuilder.where creates a LogicalFilter.
>
> In theory you ought to be able to invoke it via
> CalciteConnectionImpl.executeQuery(Queryable). I thought there were
> tests, but I can't find any.
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 3:10 PM, Michael Mior <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Others may correct me, but I don't believe this is currently supported.
> We
> > may not be able to support all of Linq4j, but I'd imagine a usable subset
> > would be possible. If you're interested in implementing, that would be
> > great! Either way, I'd suggest you file a JIRA case for this. Thanks!
> >
> > --
> > Michael Mior
> > [email protected]
> >
> > 2018-03-14 2:27 GMT-04:00 Walaa Eldin Moustafa <[email protected]>:
> >
> >> Does Calcite currently support converting a Linq4j expression to
> relational
> >> algebra? After a quick look at the code, it seems that it does not, so
> if
> >> not, do you think it is feasible? On one hand, the Linq4j expressions
> are
> >> very similar to the RelBuilder structure, (e.g., .groupBy(), .orderBy(),
> >> etc). On the other hand, the extensive use of functions (e.g.,
> selectors)
> >> and in-memory data-types may be difficult to implement as a RelBuilder.
> The
> >> use case I have in mind is to have Linq4j as another top-level interface
> >> (that is interpretable to relational algebra) to Calcite in addition to
> SQL
> >> and Piglet.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Walaa.
> >>
>



-- 
"So you have to trust that the dots will somehow connect in your future."

Reply via email to