Hi, +1 (binding)
I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE is fine - NOTICE is fine comparing the last version - no unexpected binary files p.s It would be best to collect together two or three votes from your our mentor@kevin before call for vote in IPMC mail list. Best Regards, Von Gosling > On Dec 9, 2019, at 9:33 PM, tan zhongyi <zhongyi....@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, guys, > > > > 0.9.7-rc02 is ready for vote, here it is. > > I am pleased to be calling this vote for the release of apache > brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc02. > > > The source code can be found at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/0.9.7-rc02/incubator-brpc-0.9.7-rc02.tar.gz > > > The release candidate has been tagged in GitHub as 0.9.7-rc02, available here: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-brpc/releases/tag/0.9.7-rc02 > > > The SHA-512 checksum is: > > ec57b40641734dad8f2ab9629b75a658ef35da5248b1bef8af17298f2722f18106f48d1a4bf2a4f98b2a23d9fa0c727f95863ae762ddb4c67cb02a8848ee0851 > > > > which can be found via: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/0.9.7-rc02/incubator-brpc-0.9.7-rc02.tar.gz.sha512 > > > > The signature can be found via: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/0.9.7-rc02/incubator-brpc-0.9.7-rc02.tar.gz.asc > > > > KEYS file is available here: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/KEYS > > > > > > [Release Note] > > > > * Fix many license related issues > * Health (of a connection) can be checked at rpc-level > * Fix SSL-related compilation issues on Mac > * Support SSL-replacement lib MesaLink > * Support consistent hashing with ketama algo. > * bvar variables can be exported for prometheus services > * String[Multi]Splitter supports '\0' as separator > * Support for bilibili discovery service > * Improved CircuitBreaker > * grpc impl. supports timeout > > > > > > Please vote on releasing this package as: > > Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc02 > > > > This vote will be open until “Dec 14 2019 00:00:00 GMT+0800 (CST)" and > > passes if a majority of at least three +1 Apache brpc IPMC votes are > > cast. > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package > > [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but don't object > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... > > > Checklist for reference: > [ ]Are release files in correct location? > [ ]Do release files have the word incubating in their name? > [ ] Are the digital signature and hashes correct? > [ ] Does DISCLAIMER file exist? > [ ]Do LICENSE and NOTICE files exists? > [ ] Is the LICENSE and NOTICE text correct? > [ ] Is the NOTICE year correct? > [ ] Un-included software dependencies are not mentioned in LICENSE or NOTICE? > [ ] License information is not mentioned in NOTICE? > Is there any 3rd party code contained inside the release? If so: > [ ] Does the software have a compatible license? > [ ] Are all software licenses mentioned in LICENSE? > [ ] Is the full text of the licenses (or pointers to it) in LICENSE? > Is any of this code Apache licensed? Do they have NOTICE files? If so: > [ ]Have relevant parts of those NOTICE files been added to this NOTICE file? > [ ]Do all source files have ASF headers? > [ ] Do the contents of the release match with what's tagged in version > control? > [ ] Are there any unexpected binary files in the release? > [ ] Can you compile from source? Are the instruction clear? > > > > > Anyone can participate in testing and voting, not just committers, please > > feel free to try out the release candidate and provide your votes. > > Thanks > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@brpc.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@brpc.apache.org
