+1 for 4.16.0
> Btw, why https://bookkeeper.apache.org/docs/4.14.5/overview/ says "Apache > BookKeeper 4.14.5, which is no longer actively maintained"? > I thought 4.14 was still maintained. Andrey, thanks for noticing. I created a pull for fixing it: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3411 Nicolò Boschi Il giorno mar 19 lug 2022 alle ore 18:43 Andrey Yegorov < andrey.yego...@datastax.com> ha scritto: > +1 for the 4.16 release. > Hang, did you just volunteer to do the release? :) > > We need to do a pass on open PRs to review/merge what we can, there are 100 > open PRs right now. > I'd love to see at least these in the release: > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3361 > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3383 > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3384 > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3390 > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3325 > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3329 > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3330 > > As for the minor releases, 4.15.1 is ok. > I think we also need 4.14.6; 4.15 was a major change and requires a bit of > work to upgrade to (https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/15142), e.g. > older Pulsar versions (2.10 and below) could benefit from 4.14 release. > > Btw, why https://bookkeeper.apache.org/docs/4.14.5/overview/ says "Apache > BookKeeper 4.14.5, which is no longer actively maintained"? > I thought 4.14 was still maintained. > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 12:05 AM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hang, > > > > Il giorno ven 15 lug 2022 alle ore 08:25 ZhangJian He > > <shoot...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > > > > > Hi, Hang Chen. I hope to get this change into version 4.16.0. > > > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3406 > > > > > > Thanks > > > ZhangJian He > > > > > > Hang Chen <chenh...@apache.org> 于2022年7月15日周五 11:32写道: > > > > > > > Hi Community, > > > > Bookkeeper 4.15.0 has been released for 2 months, and we have > > > > introduced Direct IO support[1] for ledger and many important bug > > > > fixes, such as fixing memory leaks [2][3], applying back pressure for > > > > v2 protocol[4], and so on. > > > > for bug fixes we should cut a 4.15.1 release as well > > > > I am +1 to cut a release for 4.16.0 > > > > I would also add this patch (that only needs a second reviewer) > > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3390 > > > > Enrico > > > > > > I would like to start to discuss releasing > > > > 4.16.0. > > > > > > > > Do you have any concerns? Do you have any other issue/ticket to > add > > > > for 4.16.0? > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pulls?q=is%3Apr+bp-47+is%3Aclosed+author%3Ahangc0276 > > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3321 > > > > [3] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3323 > > > > [4] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3324 > > > > > > > > > -- > Andrey Yegorov >