Hi Calvin, Thanks! I'm not aware of this section before and it sounds reasonable to me that we use JMH for benchmarking only while the release doesn't include those portions of code.
It should not be a problem. Best, tison. CalvinKirs <acm_mas...@163.com> 于2022年7月6日周三 14:51写道： > Hi, > > > It's not a problem, at least for JMH. > You can refer[1]. > [1]https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#prohibited > > > Best wishes！ > Calvin Kirs > > > On 07/6/2022 14:28，ZhangJian He<shoot...@gmail.com> wrote： > I created https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3385 to solve this. > > ping @enrico @merlimat > > Thanks > ZhangJian He > > ZhangJian He <shoot...@gmail.com> 于2022年7月6日周三 14:17写道： > > Hi tison. Thank you for telling us about this. > I will work on remove `microbenchmark` module. > > Thanks > ZhangJian He > > tison <wander4...@gmail.com> 于2022年7月4日周一 15:37写道： > > Hi BookKeepers, > > I notice that the main repo of bookkeeper has a module named > microbenchmark > which depends on jmh-core[1] which is licensed by GPLv2[2]. According to > Apache third party license policy[3] it's of category X and thus it cannot > be include in an ASF project. > > Is the developer team aware of this? Is it an issue that we should take > care of? > > Best, > tison. > > [1] > > > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/commit/2fbb2916a323edfc097de0de9b2d81e59b37bf6f > [2] > > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/code-tools/jmh/file/2be2df7dbaf8/jmh-core/LICENSE > [3] https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html > > >
