In the mentioned thread, everyone agreed to drop Gradle. A month has passed
and nobody raised a hand in favor of Gradle.
Also, as Henry said, nobody from the Splunk team is able to fully work on
that.

So I believe we're good to go with Gradle removal

Nicolò Boschi


Il giorno mar 7 giu 2022 alle ore 02:47 ZhangJian He <shoot...@gmail.com>
ha scritto:

> @sreeam
> Hi, sreeam. I haven't consider Bazel yet.
> Currently encountering some problems on gradle, we still using maven for
> release.
> IMO, using Bazel doesn't solve problems we meet(No active volunteers solve
> build problems).
>
> Thanks
> ZhangJian He
>
> sreeram duvur <sdu...@gmail.com> 于2022年6月7日周二 05:15写道:
>
> > Have you considered Bazel?
> >
> > https://youtu.be/dz-CFEwJuko
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 1:56 PM Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > The contributors from Splunk contributed the Gradle build system with
> the
> > > hope that it would replace Maven as the build system for BK, which
> offers
> > > more flexibility and performance.
> > > The team has been trying to continue our contributions for updating and
> > > fixing the Gradle issues, and the dual build systems are supposed to be
> > > temporary until we entirely move to Gradle.
> > > However, the team from Splunk had some reprioritization of work hence
> > they
> > > were not able to fully work on fixing it.
> > >
> > > However, it seems like there aren't many interests to help pick up
> Gradle
> > > and make it be the only one build system for BK.
> > >
> > > - Henry
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 5:21 AM ZhangJian He <shoot...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello, community, the previous discuss is in
> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/k3pdlpbvkzt061338fkxtppq3z70nk03.
> > > >
> > > > ## the main reason to remove gradle from porject
> > > > 1. Maintaining two build system is burden.
> > > > 2. Gradle have other issues and no one actually volunteered to fix
> > them.
> > > > 3. We don't have active committers who familiar with gradle
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > ZhangJian He
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to