Alessandro,
Thanks for pointing this out.

>From my point of view these items are to be checked:
- We have problems on Integration Tests (on GitHub Actions,
https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/2315/checks?check_run_id=600090302,
but I can reproduce the issue locally)
- we have a few PR pending https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pulls some
of them are trivial but very useful new features or bug fixes
- we have this blocker issue from Ivan
https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/2303 that is related to a patch
from Rajan already committed to master, we must reach consensus here

I hope that we can address all of this topic soon, then we can cut 4.11.

+1 about making 4.10 marked as stable as soon as we release 4.11

Enrico


Il giorno lun 20 apr 2020 alle ore 07:22 Alessandro Luccaroni - Diennea
<alessandro.luccar...@diennea.com.invalid> ha scritto:

> Hi BookKeepers,
> today is theoretically code freeze day for 4.11, see
> https://bookkeeper.apache.org/community/releases/
>
> Also, in the last 4 month we have released no minor release for 4.10 and
> 4.9 (and 4.9.2 is still referenced as the "stable" release).
>
> Are there any plan to proceed with a 4.11 release? Do we wait for 4.10.1
> to declare 4.10 stable or we simply have to cast a vote?
>
> Regards,
> Alessandro Luccaroni
> Platform Manager @ Diennea - MagNews
> Tel.: (+39) 0546 066100 Int. 924 - Mob.: (+39) 393 7273519
> Viale G.Marconi 30/14 - 48018 Faenza (RA) - Italy
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY & PRIVACY NOTICE
> This e-mail (including any attachments) is strictly confidential and may
> also contain privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient
> you are not authorised to read, print, save, process or disclose this
> message. If you have received this message by mistake, please inform the
> sender immediately and destroy this e-mail, its attachments and any copies.
> Any use, distribution, reproduction or disclosure by any person other than
> the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and the person responsible
> may incur in penalties.
> The use of this e-mail is only for professional purposes; there is no
> guarantee that the correspondence towards this e-mail will be read only by
> the recipient, because, under certain circumstances, there may be a need to
> access this email by third subjects belonging to the Company.
>

Reply via email to