+1 Best Regards.
Jia Zhai Beijing, China Mobile: +86 15810491983 On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 10:07 PM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> wrote: > Cc dev@bookkeeper > If it works well for Pulsar we could try for BK, we have a quite complex > precommit job set > > > Enrico > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > Da: Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> > Date: mar 27 ago 2019, 14:26 > Subject: Re: Jenkins migration proposal > To: <d...@pulsar.apache.org> > > > +1 for moving to actions. It looks to be azure pipelines in > background. It should be able to give us more hermetic testing. > Jenkins has always had issues of old builds hanging around the cluster > and causing unreproducible flakes. > > FYI, infra are giving their blessing to people trying it out. > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-builds/201908.mbox/%3cd425ae5c-7977-7aed-7fd8-ef63a6c0a...@apache.org%3e > > -Ivan > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 9:50 PM Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > The results look promising. > > > > +1 > > > > - Sijie > > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 1:37 PM Ali Ahmed <alahmed...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I have finished by poc with Github actions. I propose we disable the > > > jenkins pr check in jobs with this. The benefits are more stable test > runs > > > and more available resources to instantly start running checkin jobs. > > > > > > The experimental PR is here. > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/5035 > > > > > > We should be able to do the migration very quickly. > > > > > > -Ali > > > >
