> @Ivan, for some reasons I did not receive your reply but found it in the > email archives.
Are you subscribed to the list? I did see one mail from you show up in moderation. > At 80K request/sec throttling for record size of 1K, I am getting below > throughput. The 99th percentile of `bookkeeper_server_ADD_ENTRY_REQUEST` and > `bookkeeper_server_ADD_ENTRY` are around 350 ms. I am starting to see the lag > when I increase the ingestion rate limit beyond 90 K/sec limit. So this suggests to me that the metrics are reporting correctly. > The disks were under 60% utilization (not saturated). 60% of bandwidth or iops? only one of the two needs to be saturated. And which disk, journal or ledgers? > Are there any benchmark results of BookKeeper that can be shared? I don't have any to hand, but maybe someone else on the list does. Regards, Ivan
