Updates: I merged the PRs. so all the dlog modules are moved to bookkeeper repo and they are only activated when "-Ddistributedlog" is provided.
Will work on updating CI and integrate the documentation. - Sijie On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 9:59 PM, Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Updates: > > I merged the corresponding modules into a bk branch. details are described > in https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/1068 > > A subsequent PR to integrate those modules with BK pom files. In this PR, > this modules will not be built unless `-Pdistributedlog` is provided. > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/1069 > > Please help review it. > > - Sijie > > On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 11:00 AM, Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> This BP is accepted. see details at : https://github.com/apache/bo >> okkeeper/pull/1025#issuecomment-360871025 >> >> I've updated the master ticket #1024 >> <https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/1024> with corresponding >> sub tasks. >> >> - Sijie >> >> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 6:11 AM, Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 3:44 AM, Enrico Olivelli - Diennea < >>> enrico.olive...@diennea.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Il giorno ven, 19/01/2018 alle 13.17 -0800, Sijie Guo ha scritto: >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I started a BP for proposing merging distributedlog library as part of >>>> bookkeeper. So >>>> >>>> 1) bookkeeper has a higher level log api, provideing named logs over >>>> numbered ledgers. it would make the usage of bookkeeper simpler and help >>>> grow more usage in bookkeeper >>>> >>>> 2) it would make distributedlog library shipped as part of bookkeeper >>>> release. It will make the users of distributedlog library easier, >>>> because >>>> they just need install bookkeeper and use dlog api. An integrated >>>> release >>>> procedure will provide better user experiences. >>>> >>>> Details are proposed in the BP pull request: >>>> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/1025 >>>> >>>> Please take a look. Comments are welcome. >>>> >>>> >>>> (I have already voted a big +1 on GitHub) >>>> >>>> >>>> Side question: >>>> >>>> Will the +1 on the Pull Request be valid as official "VOTE" or should >>>> we start an email thread ? >>>> >>> >>> >>> Yes +1 / approve on the pull request is the vote for the new BP >>> workflow. >>> >>> >>>> >>>> This is an important change, to me rules are not very clear with the >>>> new github BP workflow, I knew on ASF it is important that all votes are >>>> done by means of official mailing lists >>>> >>> >>> ASF requires all the conversations recorded in the ASF mailing list, >>> which all the github notifications are already sent and kept in issues@b.a.o >>> mailing list. >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Enrico >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> - Sijie >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Enrico Olivelli Software Development Manager @Diennea Tel.: (+39) 0546 >>>> 066100 - Int. 925 Viale G.Marconi 30/14 - 48018 Faenza (RA) MagNews - >>>> E-mail Marketing Solutions http://www.magnews.it Diennea - Digital >>>> Marketing Solutions http://www.diennea.com >>>> >>>> ________________________________ >>>> >>>> Iscriviti alla nostra newsletter per rimanere aggiornato su digital ed >>>> email marketing! http://www.magnews.it/newsletter/ >>>> >>>> The information in this email is confidential and may be legally >>>> privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender >>>> immediately and destroy this email. Any unauthorized, direct or indirect, >>>> disclosure, copying, storage, distribution or other use is strictly >>>> forbidden. >>>> >>> >>> >> >
