+1 (non binding)
looks good to me

- Built and tested candidate source tar ball
- Run Bookie and basic Bookie shel commands from the "dist all" package
- Checked tag on GitHub
- All tests are passing on my downstream projects (some of them need
re-compiling or minor changes)

Thank you Jia for driving this and to every body, I expect great
improvements in production

Notes:

1) There is a failing test on my dev machine, even on master. I think this
is not blocker for the release. It must be some problem on my machine:

testWithDiskFullAndAbilityToCreateNewIndexFile(org.apache.bookkeeper.bookie.BookieInitializationTest)
Time elapsed: 12.871 sec  <<< FAILURE!
java.lang.AssertionError: Bookie should be up and running
    at
org.apache.bookkeeper.bookie.BookieInitializationTest.testWithDiskFullAndAbilityToCreateNewIndexFile(BookieInitializationTest.java:602)


2) NOTICE reports very old copyright note (dates to 2015) -> we should
check this on every file, not just this one, it is not a problem I think

3) EnsemblePlacementPolicy changed signatures of methods -> compile time
issue on downstream projects, I already knew, not a problem. I will not
create any issue.

4) BookKeeper.Builder#build -> now throws BKException -> compile time issue
on downstream projects, but it is not a showstopper. I wlil not create any
issue. This was expected.

5) Dropped dependency on commons collections -> so this disappeared from
downstream projects -> it is not a real problem, downstream project must
explicitly declare their own dependencies, it is not a BK problem.

6) We have better "BKException#getMessage", this has some impact on test
cases of downstream projects -> it is not a problem, I consider this a bug
on downstream projects, testcases should be more robust as BK provides
typed Exceptions

Enrico


2017-12-05 6:19 GMT+01:00 Jia Zhai <zhai...@apache.org>:

> Hi everyone,
>
> Please review and vote on the release candidate #0 for the version
> 4.6.0, as follows:
> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
> * Release notes [1]
> * The official Apache source and binary distributions to be deployed
> to dist.apache.org [2]
> * All artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [3]
> * Source code tag "release-4.6.0" [4]
>
> BookKeeper's KEYS file contains PGP keys we used to sign this
> release:https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/bookkeeper/KEYS
>
> Please download these packages and review this release candidate:
>
> - Review release notes
> - Download the source package (verify md5, shasum, and asc) and follow the
> instructions to build and run the bookkeeper service.
> - Download the binary package (verify md5, shasum, and asc) and follow the
> instructions to run the bookkeeper service.
> - Review maven repo, release tag, licenses, and any other things you think
> it is important to a release.
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>
> Thanks,
> Jia Zhai
>
> [1] *https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/759
> <https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/759>*
> [2] *https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bookkeeper/
> bookkeeper-4.6.0-rc0/
> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bookkeeper/bookkeeper-4.6.0-rc0/>*
> [3] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapachebookkeeper-1021/
> [4] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/tree/release-4.6.0
>

Reply via email to