I think it is better to change the docker image process, leaving tag untouched. I have raised the discussion about official docker image ago. That was for addressing the issues I have seen in docker image generation. I think we should revisit docker release process rather than tag.
On Nov 29, 2017 1:29 PM, "Enrico Olivelli" <eolive...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > During the release process we are voting a 'tag' but because of docker > builder requirements we have to drop that voted tag and create a new one. > I think that we can improve this process by writing explicitly the commit > sha in the vote email so that it is clear what PMC and other > committers/contributors are voting and they are sure that this will not be > altered in the future. > I saw this in Apache Calcite vote process for instance. > We can also make an improvement to write the git sha on manifests as we are > voting on binaries (I think that the vote is really on source, not on > binaries) > > This is just an idea, maybe I misunderstand the process. But in this case > it would be better not to cite the tag in the email and let people vote > only on the staged source artifacts and/or make it clearer in the email > what exactly we are going to release (binaries, sources, git sha, git > tag...) > > I am not a lawyer I just want to understand what I am doing and improve > things. > > Enrico > -- > > > -- Enrico Olivelli >
