> Let's not hijack the release thread. We should move forward with 4.5.1 and > 4.6.0 release. 4.5.1rc0 is already defunct due to too many flakes and a bad notice file. There's been two changes since, so I would expect a new rc next week.
> Ivan, if you have a better idea on improving the release process, let's do > a separate BP. I don't think anyone else agrees that it's a bad idea to have signed binaries going around with the same filename but a different sha, so I'm going to draw a line under it, and move on. -Ivan