> Let's not hijack the release thread. We should move forward with 4.5.1 and
> 4.6.0 release.
4.5.1rc0 is already defunct due to too many flakes and a bad notice
file. There's been two changes since, so I would expect a new rc next
week.

> Ivan, if you have a better idea on improving the release process, let's do
> a separate BP.
I don't think anyone else agrees that it's a bad idea to have signed
binaries going around with the same filename but a different sha, so
I'm going to draw a line under it, and move on.

-Ivan

Reply via email to