+1, - verified packages checksum (md5, asc and sha1 all good)
- the source package build and test all run successfully. - NOTICE, DISCLAIME, License headers in binary package look good. A minor issue is that the docker and site directory only contains a README.md, and all other files are missing. Is this deliberate? On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > Please review and vote on the release candidate #0 for the version > 4.5.1, as follows: > [ ] +1, Approve the release > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments) > > The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes: > * Release notes [1] > * The official Apache source and binary distributions to be deployed > to dist.apache.org [2] > * All artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [3] > * Source code tag "release-4.5.1" [4] > > BookKeeper's KEYS file contains PGP keys we used to sign this > release:https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/bookkeeper/KEYS > > Please download these packages and review this release candidate: > > - Review release notes > - Download the source package (verify md5, shasum, and asc) and follow the > instructions to build and run the bookkeeper service. > - Download the binary package (verify md5, shasum, and asc) and follow the > instructions to run the bookkeeper service. > - Review maven repo, release tag, licenses, and any other things you think > it is important to a release. > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority > approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. > > Thanks, > Enrico Olivelli > > [1] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/678 > [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bookkeeper/ > bookkeeper-4.5.1-rc0/ > [3] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > orgapachebookkeeper-1015/org/apache/bookkeeper/ > [4] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/tree/release-4.5.1 >
