On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 11:53 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thank you  Sijie
> from my point of view the HttpServer is ready to go, will we include it in
> 4.5 in your opinion ?
>

It is an isolated feature and off by default. I think it can go in 4.5 but
we probably don't announce it in 4.5, but anyone who want to try out can
enable it.


>
>  -- Enrico
>
> 2017-08-01 8:51 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com>:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 11:43 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Great!
> > >
> > > some questions:
> > > - TLS support ? will this be in ?
> > >
> >
> > Yes. TLS will be in.
> >
> >
> > > - There are a lot of flaky or constantly failing tests, shall we fix
> all
> > of
> > > them before preparing switching the master to 4.6 ?
> > >
> >
> > Yes. We need to fix them. However cutting a 4.5 branch doesn't need to be
> > blocked on it.
> >
> > If we cut 4.5, any fixes going forward has to be cherry-picked to 4.5
> > branch.
> >
> > Also, if the tests are only flaky on CI and passed most of time locally,
> > I'd prefer not mark them as blockers.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > I hope that most of us are testing current 4.5 snapshots against their
> > > applications in order to find regression
> > > I we switch the master to 4.6 I can take care of continuing to push
> > > manually the 4.5 snapshots
> > >
> >
> > I don't know if we need to do that, because we are anyway in 4.5 release
> > procedure.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > -- Enrico
> > >
> > >
> > > 2017-08-01 8:40 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > > We've tried to clean up most of the issues marked for 4.5.0. I'd like
> > to
> > > > call a code freeze for 4.5.0. So no more issues/jiras should be
> marked
> > in
> > > > 4.5.0, unless it is really needed (e.g. bug fixes).
> > > >
> > > > Any new features should be marked as 4.6.0. I will work with JV to
> > > prepare
> > > > the 4.5 branch for release.
> > > >
> > > > If I miss anything critical that needs to be in 4.5.0, please point
> > them
> > > > out.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Sijie
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to