On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Jia Zhai <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Enrico, Sijie And Flavio,
>
> Thanks a lot for the great comments on this.  the BP have changed following
> the comments.
>
> ```
> I think the labels/milestones can work as you described, but maybe we can
> consider to use composite labels like component/server or type/improvement.
> ```
> < == seems "server" could be included in label "bookie", and "improvement"
> could be included in label "task"
>
> ```
> In jira, we submit a patch when a contributor wants it merged and a
> committer cancels the patch when there are necessary changes. Do we want to
> implement a similar workflow using labels?
> ```
> < == We could control it in github pull request by feature "review changes"
> tab, right? As currently it is a try period, How about make the lablels
> simple as currently?
>

- If a change is in-progress but you want an early feedback, you can send
out a pull request with "WIP - Issue xxxx".
- If a change is done and you want to review, you can send out a pull
request with "Issue xxxx".
- If people reviewed a pull request and the change needs to be improved,
people should "request changes" through the github review button. the merge
script should only merge changes approved by committers and no pending
'request changes'.



>
>
> ```
> It might be worth adding a point to the proposal about sub-tasks as this is
> probably how we will be working with umbrella issues: use (- [ ]) for
> each subtask and create a corresponding issue to map to the sub-task.
> ```
> < == have changed the issue_template to include suggestion for subtasks.
>
> ```
> we could just say that we always create
> an issue for a pull request and the only discussions on the pull requests
> are the ones about the code changes
> ```
> < ==  have changed this in the BP, to always create an issue for change.
>
>
> Regarding the permissions, have opened INFRA issue
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14337> to confirm.
>
> Regarding the release part, we will start a new BP to discuss it, such as
> the release procedures, how to prepare the release notes, etc.
>
>
> Thanks a lot.
> -Jia
>

Reply via email to