[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1096?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Sijie Guo resolved BOOKKEEPER-1096. ----------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 4.5.0 Issue resolved by merging pull request 186 [https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/186] {noformat} commit 07852d35856dca232450135913090bac27b29abe Author: Charan Reddy Guttapalem <cguttapa...@salesforce.com> AuthorDate: Mon Jun 12 08:20:53 2017 -0700 Commit: Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> CommitDate: Mon Jun 12 08:20:53 2017 -0700 BOOKKEEPER-1096: recursive znode delete When ledger is deleted, along with leaf node all the eligible branch nodes should be deleted in ZooKeeper. Author: Charan Reddy Guttapalem <cguttapa...@salesforce.com> Reviewers: Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> Closes #186 from reddycharan/recursiveznodedelete {noformat} > When ledger is deleted, along with leaf node all the eligible branch nodes > also should be deleted in ZooKeeper. > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: BOOKKEEPER-1096 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1096 > Project: Bookkeeper > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Charan Reddy Guttapalem > Assignee: Charan Reddy Guttapalem > Fix For: 4.5.0 > > > Currently when we delete a ledger, we delete just the leaf node in the ZK but > we ignore about the branch nodes. This is ok for FlatLedgerManager, but for > HierarchicalLedgerManagers, especially for LongHierarchicalLedgerManager, the > number of internal nodes gets blown up over time and we would get into ZK > capacity limitations. When ZK reaches the capacity limits, it will manifest > in very severe performance and stability issues of cluster. So for > HierarchicalLedgerManagers, when we delete a ledger we should optimistically > recursively delete the parent znodes as well if they don’t have anymore child > znodes. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)