Il gio 8 giu 2017, 14:11 Flavio Junqueira <f...@apache.org> ha scritto:
> Ok, thanks for the clarification. I was having a look at the issues you > pointed out: > > - BK-670: That's quite an old issue! There are 5 sub-tasks, 2 resolved, 1 > patch available, and 2 unresolved. I can see that you have reviewers for > the patch available one, but let me know if you need help reviewing it. For > the remaining two, is there anyone looking at them? > There are pending PR for each issue, this I quite a big patch and so an expert reviewer will help a lot. We say we would like to cut the 4.5.0 within 2 or 3 weeks - BK-575: There is one reviewer assigned for the remaining sub-task. I can > also review if you want me to. > There is a pending PR from me, which in turn I have created from an original patch from Ivan Kelly. Kishore from Salesforce is going to rebase it on Netty 4 and introduce better handling for SSL client auth. Enrico > -Flavio > > > On 08 Jun 2017, at 12:39, Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > BOOKKEEPER-670 (long poll) and BOOKKEEPER-575 (SSL) are the two remaining > > big features for 4.5.0. The timeline for 4.5.0 for completing > > BOOKKEEPER-670 is in 2 weeks. The SSL one is almost done, waiting for > > Kishore pushing a new pull request. > > > > We don't do 4.4.1 because we are converging Twitter/Yahoo/Salesforce > > branches in 4.5.0, unless there is a critical bug coming up. We defer > > creating 4.4.1 until it is really needed. > > > > - Sijie > > > > On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 2:44 AM, Flavio Junqueira <f...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >> Hi there, > >> > >> I wanted to check about the status of our releases. According to jira, > >> there are only 3 blockers and 2 of them are documentation issues for > 4.5.0. > >> Does it mean that the we should be able to release 4.5.0 shortly? There > are > >> already 116 issues resolved for 4.5.0 also according to jira. > >> > >> I don't see an unreleased version 4.4.1 on jira, are we not doing a bug > >> fix release for the 4.4 branch? I can't believe that the 4.4 branch has > no > >> bugs. :-) > >> > >> I'd appreciate some feedback here. > >> > >> -Flavio > > -- -- Enrico Olivelli
