[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16011529#comment-16011529
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on BOOKKEEPER-1066:
--------------------------------------------
Github user jvrao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/153
Interesting and on the paper sounds great. But do we have any perf testing
or benchmark? I believe we need to have a benchmark / ref to run and compare
any perf improvements. I have seen extremely interesting results for changes
which made absolute sense on paper. :)
> Introduce GrowableArrayBlockingQueue
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: BOOKKEEPER-1066
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1066
> Project: Bookkeeper
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Matteo Merli
> Assignee: Matteo Merli
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 4.5.0
>
>
> In multiple places, (eg: journal, ordered executor, etc..), we are using
> {{LinkedBlockingQueue}} instances to pass objects between threads.
> The {{LinkedBlockingQueue}} differs from the {{ArrayBlockingQueue}} in that
> it doesn't require to define a max queue size, though, being implemented with
> a linked list, it requires to allocates list nodes each time an item is added.
> We can use a {{GrowableArrayBlockingQueue}} that behaves in the same way as
> the {{LinkedBlockingQueue}}, but it's implemented with an array that can be
> resized when the queue reaches the capacity.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
