works for me. I will update the schedule.

- Sijie

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Rithin Shetty <rit...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Sijie,
>
>     Unfortunately, I'll be OOO this Thursday. Can we move this topic to
> next week ? I'll have the wiki updated by then. Sorry about the late
> notice.
>
> --Rithin
>
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Flavio Junqueira <
> fpjunque...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> > The wiki page is actually empty...
> >
> > -Flavio
> >
> > > On 29 Nov 2016, at 18:58, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Just a reminder - We will have a community meeting on 12/1. We will
> > > discuss BP-2:
> > > Resource aware data placement
> > > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/
> > BP-2+-+Resource+aware+data+placement>
> > > .
> > >
> > > - Sijie
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Matteo Merli <matteo.me...@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 12:22 PM Yiming Zang
> <yz...@twitter.com.invalid
> > >
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> SGTM +1
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <
> > >>> jujj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Sounds good.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 1:41 AM Enrico Olivelli <
> eolive...@gmail.com>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Ok for me.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Enrico
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Il mar 15 nov 2016, 10:39 Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> ha scritto:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> We will continue discussing the 'resource aware data placement' in
> > >>> the
> > >>>>> next
> > >>>>>> community meeting.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> However, I think it is 11/24. I guess most of the people might
> > >>> already
> > >>>>> have
> > >>>>>> some plan around that time. Shall we move the meeting one week
> > >> after,
> > >>>>> which
> > >>>>>> is Dec 1st?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Does that sound good?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> - Sijie
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>> --
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> -- Enrico Olivelli
> > >>>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> Sent from iPhone
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to