If the community decides to move forward with the proposal and the SDK
reaches a stable status, then eventually, yes.

On Tue, Oct 13, 2026 at 10:58 PM Ganesh Sivakumar <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Pablo,
>
> Thanks for sharing this proposal, it's satisfying to see Beam pipelines
> written in Rust. Any plans for publishing Beam Rust SDK crates to
> crates.io? and as I am also working on a Rust Runner, I'd feel
> comfortable contributing to SDK as well.
>
> Thanks,
> Ganesh
>
>
>
> From: pablo rodriguez defino <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 07:56:13 +0530
> Subject: Fwd: [Request for Feedback] Apache Beam Rust SDK
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've been working on an Apache Beam SDK in Rust, building on the ideas
> from the 2023 hackathon and design notes [1, 2], and I wanted to share the
> design doc and current progress on the implementation with the list:
>
>    - Design doc
>    
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1M4ZsHNobSt526__rtcwp7K0ULvL9sAKnKBt39CcA7Vw/view>
>    .
>    - Code (branch `feat/rust-sdk`
>    
> <https://github.com/prodriguezdefino/beam-pabs/tree/feat/rust-sdk/sdks/rust>
>    ).
>
> The doc goes through the main design choices (targeting portability with
> Prism and Dataflow Runner v2, static typing and coders, the `DoFn` trait,
> and how the worker locates user code) and what is currently implemented and
> minimally validated on the branch.
>
> First of all, thanks for your attention =) I'd love to hear if there is
> interest in the community in having this contributed to Beam, and get
> general thoughts on the approach. Section 6 of the doc also lists a few
> open topics, if anyone wants to chime in:
>
>    - worker code registration,
>    - `DoFn` ergonomics,
>    - whether it should live in the main repo or a separate one,
>    - and a proposed stacked-PR plan for review.
>
> Any comments on the doc or replies on this thread are very welcome!
>
> Thanks,
> Pablo
>
> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/xg9xq0btp8k1wh2v1gpqyfhwpsyxq4ds
> [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/gwnn0l9qq3x8svjbwmsr8cykq8600vhz
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to