Thank you for everyone's feedback on the naming. There were other related discussions about container images that were really helpful to read. However, for the sake of moving https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-26298 forward, I'm assuming no one has blocking concerns.
I'll respond to the individual non-naming related issues in time. Thank you so much. Best, Damon On 2024/11/25 22:31:03 Damon Douglas wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Work is currently underway <https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/32815> to > build support for distroless container images > <https://github.com/GoogleContainerTools/distroless>. The purpose of this > message is to query any concerns over their naming convention, where simply > "_distroless" is added as a suffix. Currently, as an example, for the > Apache Beam Python 3.12 SDK, we publish apache/beam_python3.12_sdk > <https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/beam_python3.12_sdk> and for Java 17, we > publish apache/beam_java17_sdk > <https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/beam_java17_sdk>. The distroless variants > of these aforementioned will be apache/beam_python3.12_sdk_distroless and > apache/beam_java17_sdk_distroless, respectively. Please let me know if you > have any concerns with the following proposed distroless variants. Note > that not all versions of Python and Java will be supported. > > apache/beam_python3.9_sdk_distroless > apache/beam_python3.10_sdk_distroless > apache/beam_python3.11_sdk_distroless > apache/beam_python3.12_sdk_distroless > apache/beam_java17_sdk_distroless > apache/beam_java21_sdk_distroless > > Best, > > Damon >
