Just to close the loop on the dev@ archives, is it correct that fastavro 1.8.1 resolves their end and now it is just Beam work left to do?
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 7:18 PM Eddie Zhou <ed...@glean.com> wrote: > Hi folks, > > I see some active work on https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/27526 for > Cython 3.0 fixes, but wondering if anyone knows the fastavro maintainers > and can prioritize the fix proposed in > https://github.com/fastavro/fastavro/issues/701 > > Thanks! > > Best, > Eddie >
